Tag Archives: Joe Sobran

Monopoly of force and the personalistic norm

The essence of the state is its legal monopoly of force. But force is subhuman; in words I quote incessantly, Simone Weil defined it as “that which turns a person into a thing — either corpse or slave.” It may sometimes be a necessary evil, in self-defense or defense of the innocent, but nobody can have by right what the state claims: an exclusive privilege of using it. –Joe Sobran

Against the power of the State, the proper response to a person is love.  See Karol Wojtyła’s “personalistic norm” in his Love and Responsibility, Ignatius Press, 1993, page 41.

The rational limits to politics

I’d bet a million dollars we’ll hear nothing of the sort in tonight’s third presidential “debate”.

During his 1965 race for mayor of New York, he [WFB] made a sublime promise to the voter: he offered “the internal composure that comes of knowing there are rational limits to politics.” This may have been the most futile campaign promise of all time, but it would have won my vote! –Joe Sobran

Chesterton on patriotism

G.K. Chesterton, with his usual gentle audacity, once criticized Rudyard Kipling for his “lack of patriotism.” Since Kipling was renowned for glorifying the British Empire, this might have seemed one of Chesterton’s “paradoxes”; but it was no such thing, except in the sense that it denied what most readers thought was obvious and incontrovertible.

Chesterton, himself a “Little Englander” and opponent of empire, explained what was wrong with Kipling’s view: “He admires England, but he does not love her; for we admire things with reasons, but love them without reason. He admires England because she is strong, not because she is English.” Which implies there would be nothing to love her for if she were weak.

Of course Chesterton was right. You love your country as you love your mother — simply because it is yours, not because of its superiority to others, particularly superiority of power. –Joe Sobran